Journalistic (self)-criticism: Effect of convergence managerial strategies on journalistic representations

Authors

  • Amandine Degand Université catholique de Louvain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS632012595

Keywords:

managerial strategies, convergence, online journalism, integration, criticism

Abstract

This article addresses the issue of convergence through the lens of journalistic views. How do journalists perceive the organizational innovations that they need on a daily basis? One of the objectives of this research is to evaluate the effect of various managerial strategies (integration, involvement, economic strategies) on journalist representations. We present the results of an extensive ethnographic survey conducted between the end of 2009 and the beginning of 2010, in 11 newsrooms of French-speaking Belgium. During this survey, 101 interviews with journalists were gathered. We applied a thematic analysis to this extensive empirical material (Paillé and Mucchielli, 2003) and descriptive counts by cross-tabulation with the Nvivo software. This method shows that some strategic options have managed to improve the consideration of Web teams or weaken some resistance towards collaborative work with the Web. However, whether working online or offline, journalists appear particularly critical in regard to Webjournalism. All of them keep their distance from Web team work, which is overwhelmingly considered unrewarding. This intense criticism by journalists is interpreted as one of the main drivers of the permanent reshaping of journalism, on two levels. Firstly, criticism is a possible fulcrum for editorial reorganization. It is by taking into account journalistic criticism that the management can establish convergence according to methods that will be judged more balanced by the journalists concerned. Secondly, criticism is a node that allows the issue of identity to be addressed. Once integrated and implemented in a dialog process, criticism indeed allows journalists to rethink and constantly reassess the reasons for their commitment to their profession.

Author Biography

Amandine Degand, Université catholique de Louvain

Amandine Degand is a member of the Observatoire du récit médiatique (ORM)of the University of Louvain (UCL). She has just finished a PhD thesis regarding online journalism in Belgium.

Downloads

Published

2012-09-05

How to Cite

Degand, A. (2012). Journalistic (self)-criticism: Effect of convergence managerial strategies on journalistic representations. Observatorio (OBS*), 6(3). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS632012595

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2012)

Section

Articles

License

Observatorio (OBS*) has an academic journal profile. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of its contents, and freely available to individuals and institutions without charge or formal permission. Copies of this journal or articles in this journal may be distributed for research or educational purposes free of charge and without permission. Authors will not be charged for publication or submission to this journal. Authors who publish in Observatorio (OBS*) will release their contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-2.0 generic. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given - being the author the copyright holder. This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. The publisher perpetually authorizes participants in the LOCKSS system to archive and restore our publication through the LOCKSS System for the benefit of all LOCKSS System participants. Specifically participating libraries may: • Collect and preserve currently accessible materials; • Use material consistent with original license terms; • Provide copies to other LOCKSS appliances for purposes of audit and repair. Fair use of a copyrighted work, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; & 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. In accord with these provisions, the OBS journal believes in the vigorous assertion and defense of Fair Use by scholars engaged in academic research, teaching and non-commercial publishing. Thus, we view the inclusion of “quotations” from existing print, visual, audio and audio-visual texts to be appropriate examples of Fair Use, as are reproductions of visual images for the purpose of scholarly analysis. We encourage authors to obtain appropriate permissions to use materials originally produced by others, but do not require such permissions as long as the usage of such materials falls within the boundaries of Fair Use.