Análisis comparado de la representación de personajes LGBT+ en las series españolas de televisión generalista emitidas en prime time y originales de plataformas de streaming

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17120232083

Keywords:

ficción televisiva, series, personajes, estereotipos, género, LGTB

Abstract

En la presente investigación se desarrolla un análisis comparado de la representación de personajes LGTB+ en las series de producción española emitidas en prime time en televisión generalista y las producidas por las principales plataformas en streaming, partiendo de dos muestras diferentes: una de ellas se compone de 21 capítulos emitidos en el segundo semestre de 2017 y durante todo 2018 en canales generalistas nacionales y la otra contiene 33 capítulos de series españolas producidas originalmente por diferentes plataformas de streaming. Para ello, se ha realizado un análisis de contenido analizando un total de 1.274 personajes (n=514 y n=760, respectivamente). Entre los principales resultados de la investigación se ha podido comprobar que sigue existiendo una infrarrepresentación de personajes LGTB+, comparada con los datos demográficos de población española, aunque su presencia aumenta levemente en el caso de las series producidas para plataformas de streaming. Se ha encontrado, además, un aumento en cuanto al número de personajes LGTB+ con papeles protagonistas con respecto a estudios anteriores. A pesar de la mejora en las cifras de representación, los personajes LGTB+ no están presentes en los contenidos de todas las plataformas. Por otra parte, no se encontró ninguna relación estadísticamente significativa entre la orientación sexual y la hipersexualización de los personajes, ni en otros aspectos como la relación entre orientación sexual y violencia.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-20

How to Cite

Marcos Ramos, M., Martín García, T., & González de Garay, B. (2023). Análisis comparado de la representación de personajes LGBT+ en las series españolas de televisión generalista emitidas en prime time y originales de plataformas de streaming. Observatorio (OBS*), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS17120232083

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 María Marcos Ramos, Teresa Martín García, Beatriz González de Garay Observatorio (OBS*) has an academic journal profile. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of its contents, and freely available to individuals and institutions without charge or formal permission. Copies of this journal or articles in this journal may be distributed for research or educational purposes free of charge and without permission. Authors will not be charged for publication or submission to this journal. Authors who publish in Observatorio (OBS*) will release their contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-2.0 generic. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given - being the author the copyright holder. This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. The publisher perpetually authorizes participants in the LOCKSS system to archive and restore our publication through the LOCKSS System for the benefit of all LOCKSS System participants. Specifically participating libraries may: • Collect and preserve currently accessible materials; • Use material consistent with original license terms; • Provide copies to other LOCKSS appliances for purposes of audit and repair. Fair use of a copyrighted work, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; & 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. In accord with these provisions, the OBS journal believes in the vigorous assertion and defense of Fair Use by scholars engaged in academic research, teaching and non-commercial publishing. Thus, we view the inclusion of “quotations” from existing print, visual, audio and audio-visual texts to be appropriate examples of Fair Use, as are reproductions of visual images for the purpose of scholarly analysis. We encourage authors to obtain appropriate permissions to use materials originally produced by others, but do not require such permissions as long as the usage of such materials falls within the boundaries of Fair Use.