Pakistani and U.S. Press Content on Benazir Bhutto’s Assassination Frame Her Dynasty, Destiny, Death and their Secrets

Authors

  • Tania Cantrell Rosas Moreno Loyola University Maryland
  • Ingrid Bachmann Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS612012512

Keywords:

Framing theory, framing typology, interpretative textual analysis, Benazir Bhutto, prevalent latent news frame, absent/trump latent news frame

Abstract

Few studies have investigated how the press covers political leader assassinations, and its societal, cultural and political connotations, particularly when that leader is female. Using framing theory, this textual analysis investigated how more than 200 stories from three Pakistani English dailies portrayed the murder of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, and compared it to a similar sample of U.S. news reports. Pakistani press used three prevalent latent frames—the devastating effects of her death, the fulfillment of a prophetic demise, and efforts to keep the assassination’s details under wraps. Also, it employed two absent latent frames—obscured gender and religion, and candidate without an election—to organize the information. In contrast, the U.S. coverage relied on two prevalent latent frames—the secret diplomacy behind Bhutto’s return to Pakistan and the individual and national danger surrounding her life. The (in)ability of the presses to make sense of the assassination is discussed.

Author Biography

Tania Cantrell Rosas Moreno, Loyola University Maryland

Tania Cantrell Rosas-Moreno is an assistant professor in Loyola University Maryland's Department of Communication. Her research interests include international communication, political communication, diversity issues and Brazil.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-15

How to Cite

Rosas Moreno, T. C., & Bachmann, I. (2012). Pakistani and U.S. Press Content on Benazir Bhutto’s Assassination Frame Her Dynasty, Destiny, Death and their Secrets. Observatorio (OBS*), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS612012512

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2012)

Section

Articles

License

Observatorio (OBS*) has an academic journal profile. As such, it is dedicated to the open exchange of its contents, and freely available to individuals and institutions without charge or formal permission. Copies of this journal or articles in this journal may be distributed for research or educational purposes free of charge and without permission. Authors will not be charged for publication or submission to this journal. Authors who publish in Observatorio (OBS*) will release their contributions under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-2.0 generic. This licence allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given - being the author the copyright holder. This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. The publisher perpetually authorizes participants in the LOCKSS system to archive and restore our publication through the LOCKSS System for the benefit of all LOCKSS System participants. Specifically participating libraries may: • Collect and preserve currently accessible materials; • Use material consistent with original license terms; • Provide copies to other LOCKSS appliances for purposes of audit and repair. Fair use of a copyrighted work, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; & 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors. In accord with these provisions, the OBS journal believes in the vigorous assertion and defense of Fair Use by scholars engaged in academic research, teaching and non-commercial publishing. Thus, we view the inclusion of “quotations” from existing print, visual, audio and audio-visual texts to be appropriate examples of Fair Use, as are reproductions of visual images for the purpose of scholarly analysis. We encourage authors to obtain appropriate permissions to use materials originally produced by others, but do not require such permissions as long as the usage of such materials falls within the boundaries of Fair Use.